Cases 31 - 40 of 94
KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC vs. CEPHALON, INC., ET AL
as 2:2006cv01797
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN SALES CO., INC., BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY, INC., CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
BARR LABORATORIES, INC., BARR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., CEPHALON, INC. and others
Petitioner:
TADEKA PHARMACEUTICAL NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
WALGREEN CO. et al v. ABBVIE, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03494
Plaintiff:
HEB GROCERY COMPANY L.P., SUPERVALU INC., SAFEWAY INC. and others
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, UNIMED PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, BESINS HEALTHCARE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
WALGREEN CO. et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2018cv02357
Plaintiff:
WALGREEN CO. and THE KROGER CO.
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
COFFIN v. WALGREEN, CO. et al
as 2:2017cv04091
Plaintiff:
ANN MARIE COFFIN
Defendant:
WALGREEN, CO. , WALGREEN EASTERN CO. , WALGREENS FAMILIES OF COMPANIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
PRIMA CREATIONS, INC. v. WALGREEN CO.
as 2:2016cv01540
Plaintiff:
PRIMA CREATIONS, INC.
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv05503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
VEGA v. WALGREENS CO.
as 5:2015cv04367
Plaintiff:
JOHN VEGA
Defendant:
WALGREENS CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSSI v. WALGREEN CO.
as 2:2015cv03809
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE ROSSI
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
