Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Cottam et al v. Country Mutual Insurance Company
as 3:2019cv00527
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Cottam and Austin Cottam
Defendant:
Country Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01248
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00952
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00951
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Szanto v. Szanto et al
as 3:2018mc00438
Defendant:
Barbara Szanto Alexander, Austin Bell, Anthony Szanto and others
Trustee:
Stephen P. Arnot
Plaintiff:
Peter Szanto
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Blau et al v. Intel Corporation
as 3:2018cv00820
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anderson, Debra Austin, Joshua Blau and others
Defendant:
Intel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Hadley v. Amsberry
as 2:2017cv01532
Defendant:
Brigitte Amsberry
Plaintiff:
Chad Austin Hadley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newell et al v. Circuit Court for Washington County et al
as 3:2017cv00389
Defendant:
Circuit Court for Washington County, Citizen Review Board, DHS Child Welfare and others
Plaintiff:
Danielle Marie Newell and Mary March Newell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Austin v. Amsberry
as 2:2017cv00039
Respondent:
Ms. Bridget Amsberry
Petitioner:
Lloyd E. Austin, IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
