Cases 31 - 40 of 198
SMITH v. UMPC MERCY HOASPITALS USA CHIFE DIRECTOR AN ASSIST DIRECTORRRRR
as 2:2016cv01738
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
UMPC MERCY HOASPITALS USA CHIFE DIRECTOR AN ASSIST DIRECTORRRRR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WHIRL PUBLICATIONS et al
as 2:2016cv01656
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
WHIRL PUBLICATIONS, DIRECTOR OF SALES MARY ANN TRBOVICH and EDITOR OF MANIGER MR. OR MS. BRUNDY DUNPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SMITH v. UNITED STATES POASTMASTER GENERAL
as 2:2016cv01657
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POASTMASTER GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. MELLOW et al
as 2:2016cv01638
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
MAMMIE MELLOW and MELLON BAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. MERCY BEHAIVOR HEALTH et al
as 2:2016cv01633
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
MERCY BEHAIVOR HEALTH and JEAN CONNORS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY VOTERS REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2016cv01636
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY VOTERS REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT and PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SMITH v. ADMINISTRACTIVE SERVER ELECTION DIVISION
as 2:2016cv01592
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
ADMINISTRACTIVE SERVER ELECTION DIVISION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. SHUMAN CENTERS et al
as 2:2016cv01593
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
SHUMAN CENTERS and JUVINALL COURT DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. BEARD et al
as 2:2016cv01543
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
JEFFERY A. BEARD, BILL ROBISON, FREDRIC WALDROES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. THE GREEN SHEET OWNERS
as 2:2016cv01544
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
THE GREEN SHEET OWNERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
