Cases 31 - 40 of 459
Woods v. Fluharty et al
as 1:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
Wesley Fluharty, Jane/John Doe 1, Jane/John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Cortex Transport, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Ralph Woods
Defendant:
Cortex Transport, Inc. and Jarvy Vidal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hunsaker v. Custom Wood Products, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00740
Plaintiff:
Rickey Hunsaker and Daryl Patton
Defendant:
Custom Wood Products, Inc. and Custom Wood Products, Inc. doing business as Profile Cabinet & Design
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 Failure to Pay Earned Compensation
Boure v. Redington et al
as 2:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. Boure
Defendant:
Daniel Redington, Lacey Twellman, Rebecca Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Anich v. Wood Motor Nissan Lee's Summit LLC
as 4:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Elyester Anich
Defendant:
Wood Motor Nissan Lee's Summit LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Garcia v. Jungle Law Firm et al
as 4:2022cv00510
Plaintiff:
Diego I. Garcia
Defendant:
Jungle Law Firm, Tristen Woods and Kevin William Maxlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Wood v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv05052
Plaintiff:
Lori Jean Wood
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
