Cases 31 - 40 of 21,970
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, G. LETTLE, G. LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MONTGOMERY MCCRACKEN WALKER & RHOADS LLP v. HANDLEY
as 2:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY MCCRACKEN WALKER & RHOADS LLP
Defendant:
MICHAEL K HANDLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
WALKER v. ESSENTIA INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WALKER
Defendant:
ESSENTIA INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
NELSON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
BRIAN NELSON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DEREK OVERLANDER, RENEE VITO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimble v. Prime Care et al
as 3:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Glay Kimble
Defendant:
Prime Care, Nurse Phillips, Nurse Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCUNE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
THOMAS W MCCUNE and THOMAS W. MCCUNE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAUREL HARRY, Superintendent R. IRWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BORDEN v. WELLPATH CARE et al
as 2:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
ALLEEM ALBERT-WALKER BORDEN
Defendant:
WELLPATH CARE, T. CURTIS, A. KROMAH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CARDWELL v. HOLLIBAUGH et al
as 2:2023cv02156
Plaintiff:
JAMAR CARDWELL
Defendant:
KEN HOLLIBAUGH, DEPUTY TAYLOR, DAN CARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
