Cases 31 - 40 of 691
Rebollar, Ricardo Reynso v. Emmerich, Warden
as 3:2024cv00483
Respondent:
Warden Emmerich
Petitioner:
Ricardo Reynso Rebollar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jenkins, Aairon v. Emmerick, E.
as 3:2024cv00476
Respondent:
Warden E. Emmerick
Petitioner:
Aairon Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thurman v. Emmerich
as 3:2024cv00473
Petitioner:
Cordney Thurman
Respondent:
Warden E. Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Annamalai, Annamalai v. Emmerich, E.
as 3:2024cv00468
Respondent:
Warden E. Emmerich
Petitioner:
Annamalai Annamalai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Green, Damien v. Baier, Cassandra et al
as 3:2024cv00450
Defendant:
Dr. Todd Hamilton, Capt. Rozmary Noski, Jennifer Kilmer and others
Plaintiff:
Damien Green
Unknown:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Milwaukee Secure Detention Facility Warden
as 2:2024cv00827
Respondent:
Milwaukee Secure Detention Facility Warden
Petitioner:
Eddie B Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis, John v. Emmerich, Warden
as 3:2024cv00441
Respondent:
Warden Emmerich
Petitioner:
John Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Simmons v. Gierach
as 2:2024cv00796
Petitioner:
Tiffany Lynn Simmons
Respondent:
Warden Michael Gierach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilkerson v. Eplett et al
as 2:2024cv00791
Defendant:
Warden Cheryl Eplett, K Wiesner, Ms Pelky and others
Plaintiff:
Dwight Wilkerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medford, Scott v. Emmerich, Warden
as 3:2024cv00418
Respondent:
Warden Emmerich
Petitioner:
Scott Medford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
