Cases 31 - 40 of 217
Williams v. Weaver et al
as 5:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
John James Williams
Defendant:
FNU Weaver, Warden Luke Pettigrew, Joseph Harp Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spaulding v. Nunn et al
as 5:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Richard Patrick Spaulding
Defendant:
Warden Scott Nunn, Asst Warden Edward Mayfield, Chaplain FNU Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leppke v. El Habti
as 5:2022cv00080
Petitioner:
Jessie Leppke
Respondent:
Warden Aboutanaa El Habti and Aboutanaa El Habti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weiler II v. Boncher
as 4:2022cv00005
Petitioner:
Gregory Arthur Weiler, II
Respondent:
Warden Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Walton v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2021cv00550
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Walton
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Northeastern Oklahoma Correctional Center, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2021cv00371
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Walton
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Northeastern Oklahoma Correctional Center, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barocio v. Bowen et al
as 5:2021cv00894
Plaintiff:
Merce R Barocio
Defendant:
Warden Mark Bowen, Mark Bowen, Assistant Warden FNU Coldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinkard v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv00849
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dion Pinkard
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Ms. Hunter and Warden Lonnie Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Draper v. Martin et al
as 5:2021cv00827
Plaintiff:
Jamar J Draper
Defendant:
Warden Jimmy Martin, FNU Zender and FNU Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serrano v. Warden of the Oklahoma State Penitentiary et al
as 5:2021cv00651
Respondent:
Warden of the Oklahoma State Penitentiary and Oklahoma State of
Petitioner:
Francisco Serrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
