Cases 31 - 40 of 164
WELCH v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2015cv06538
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WELCH
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, JOHN SPEISER, JEFREY WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WELCH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv03875
Plaintiff:
KYLE L. WELCH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , JOSEPH RAPONE and CHRISTOPHER CULVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOLGEMUTH v. BLACKMER, INC. et al
as 5:2015cv02676
Plaintiff:
JOHN WOLGEMUTH
Defendant:
BLACKMER, INC. , DOVER RESOURCES, INC., PUMPING SOLUTIONS GROUP - A DOVER COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Welch et al v. American States Insurance Company
as 1:2015cv00810
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Welch and Samuel Welch
Defendant:
American States Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARROLL et al v. E-ONE, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2015cv00562
Plaintiff:
GERALD CARROLL , KENNETH CROSSWHITE , RAY FOSTER and others
Defendant:
E-ONE, INCORPORATED , PIERCE MANUFACTURING, INC. , SEAGRAVE FIRE APPARATUS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOUROVELIS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv04687
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOS SOUROVELIS , DOILA WELCH and NORYS HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL A. NUTTER, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
