Cases 31 - 40 of 412
Hancock v. Harpe
as 5:2022cv00976
Plaintiff:
Phillip Hancock
Defendant:
Scott Crow and Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowman v. Christian et al
as 6:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Gage Bowman
Defendant:
Johnnie Christian, Cody Liverman, Phillips Dilan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. Kirkpatrick et al
as 5:2022cv00912
Plaintiff:
Phillip Webb
Defendant:
Brian Kirkpatrick and Frontier Leasing Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Phillips v. National General Insurance Company
as 5:2022cv00818
Plaintiff:
Oscar Leroy Phillips
Defendant:
National General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Phillips Leasing, Inc. v. Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company
as 6:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
Phillips Leasing, Inc.
Defendant:
Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Hernandez v. Stephens County et al
as 5:2022cv00591
Plaintiff:
Phillip Hernandez
Defendant:
Stephens County, Javier Martinez and Acting Sheriff of Stephens County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trunels v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
Phillip J Trunels
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Phillips v. Crow
as 6:2022cv00175
Petitioner:
Thomas Raymond Phillips, III
Respondent:
United States of America and Scott D. Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Phillips v Rogers
as 6:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Melissa Phillips
Defendant:
Charlie Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
January v. Dennis
as 4:2022cv00165
Petitioner:
Phillip Earl January
Respondent:
Chad Dennis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
