Cases 31 - 40 of 351
Griffin v. Woodruff
as 3:2023cv00145
Petitioner:
Travis Griffin, Sr.
Respondent:
James Woodruff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BALL v. MILLER et al
as 5:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS LEROY BALL
Defendant:
JUDGE B JR MILLER, SHERIFF DAN KILGORE, LT HEATH EPPINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shipley v. Pierce
as 1:2023cv02768
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Lamar Shipley
Defendant:
Travis Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Darian Thomas
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Johnson State Prison, Brian Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman v. Johnson State Prison
as 3:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Mr. KyJuane L. Chatman
Defendant:
Johnson State Prison, Warden Antoine Caldwell, Kochelle Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BALL v. KILGORE
as 5:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS LEROY BALL
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAN KILGORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
DARIAN THOMAS
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHNSON STATE PRISON, Warden BRIAN CHAMBERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhodes v. Davis
as 4:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Travis Rhodes
Defendant:
Kenneth Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
BALL v. TRAMMELL et al
as 5:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS LEROY BALL
Defendant:
JUDGE BRENDA TRAMMELL, T WRIGHT BAKESDALE and THOMAS O DONNELL, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
