Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Lin v. Holder
as 11-938
Petitioner: Jian Tian Lin and Qing Lin
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Coach, Inc. et al v. Peking Chinese Super Buffet, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00139
Plaintiff: Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant: Peking Chinese Super Buffet, Inc., Yi Mu Chen, Song Qing Lin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Coach, Inc. et al v. Peking Chinese Super Buffet, Inc. et al
as 6:2010cv00086
Plaintiff: Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant: Peking Chinese Super Buffet, Inc., Yi Mu Chen, Song Qing Lin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Xiang Lin v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-4027
Petitioner: XIANG QING LIN
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Lin v. Holder
as 10-2768
Petitioner: Yun Qing Lin
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Lin v. Holder
as 10-2605
Petitioner: Jian Tian Lin and Qing Lin
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Li v. Cheung et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02860
Defendant: Betty Mee Cheung, John Doe and Xiu Qing Lin
Plaintiff: Zheng Nan Li
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lin v. Huang et al
as 1:2010cv02150
Defendant: Zhen Bin Huang and Peking 169 Chinese Restaurant Inc.
Plaintiff: Guang Qing Lin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Yang Lin v. Eric Holder, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-3979
Petitioner: YANG Q. LIN, also known as BRENDA LI, also known as YAN QING LIN, also known as YANQING LIN
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv02620
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?