Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Ramales et al v. Fu Tai Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09177
Plaintiff:
Oscar Perez Ramales
Defendant:
Fu Tai Inc. doing business as Merryland Buffet, Cun Yu Lin, Qing Lin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chen v. Asia Super Market Buffalo LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01146
Plaintiff:
Feng Chen
Defendant:
Asia Super Market Buffalo LLC, Rockey Ren, Ling Li Ren and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chen v. Asia Super Market Buffalo LLC et al
as 5:2021cv01157
Plaintiff:
Feng Chen
Defendant:
Asia Super Market Buffalo LLC, Rockey Ren, Ling Li Ren and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Xia et al v. New Yung Wah Carrier LLC et al
as 1:2021cv04475
Plaintiff:
Chunyu Xia, Sian Gao and Bao Jin Xu
Defendant:
New Yung Wah Carrier LLC, New Yung Wah Trading LLC, Xin Ping Zheng and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04231
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Lin v. Barr
as 20-370
Petitioner:
Bing Qing Lin
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
