Cases 41 - 50 of 50,117
Cooper v. SCI-Muncy et al
as 3:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Cooper
Defendant:
SCI-Muncy, Wendy Nickolas, C.O. Kurtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper et al v. SCI-Muncy et al
as 3:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn M Cooper and B.L.D.C.
Defendant:
SCI-Muncy, Warden Nicholas, ADA Foose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greene v. The Parole Board of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 3:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
Michael Greene
Defendant:
The Parole Board Of The Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSARIO v. BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2024cv01774
Plaintiff:
MARCUS A. ROSARIO
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and INMATE SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANTHONY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. ANTHONY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
JACOBS v. ZAKEN
as 2:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JACOBS
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden of SCI-Mahanoy et al
as 2:2024cv01716
Petitioner:
WALLACE JONES
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Mahanoy and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodloe v. Matevousion et al
as 4:2024cv00695
Petitioner:
Ronald E. Goodloe
Respondent:
Andre Matevousion, Warden Thomas E. Bargami and B. Potes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WOOD v. USA
as 2:2024cv00606
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD WOOD
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
SHAMRO v. PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2024cv00608
Petitioner:
JOSH SHAMRO
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD and SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI MERCER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
