Cases 41 - 50 of 82,327
Vanzwol v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01477
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Scylla Icy Vanzwol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05774
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Brian Anderson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Hearne v. The Home Depot
as 2:2024cv01475
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Raikoglo v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv05505
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cassidy-Hyre v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05775
Plaintiff:
Bree Lynn Cassidy- Lewis and Bree Lynn Cassidy- Hyre
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01470
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Green Builders LLC v. USA Green Builders Corporation
as 2:2024cv01469
Plaintiff:
Green Builders LLC
Defendant:
USA Green Builders Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Edgecomb v. Panda Express Inc
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Albert Edgecomb
Defendant:
Panda Express Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pi Removal- Personal Injury
Witkowski v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00304
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Petitioner:
William Howard Witkowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. AHCC - Medical et al
as 2:2024cv00305
Defendant:
Dr. Dant, AHCC - Medical and RN C Strand
Plaintiff:
Alberto Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
