Cases 41 - 50 of 94
Flemming v. Santamore et al
as 9:2015cv00550
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Scott Santamore, Leon Tuper, Solly Markel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abreu v. Travers et al
as 9:2015cv00540
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Travers, Lashway, Kornigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flemming v. Smith et al
as 9:2015cv00416
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Randal J. Smith, David Rock, Eric M. Boyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarvis et al v. Cuomo et al
as 5:2014cv01459
Plaintiff:
Mary Jarvis , Sheree D'Agostino , Charlese Davis and others
Defendant:
Governor Andrew Cuomo, Sheila J. Poole and Civil Service Employees Association, Local 1000 AFSCME, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson et al v. Merchant Source Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv07545
Plaintiff:
Johnny Robinson and Kelly Jarvis
Defendant:
Merchant Source Inc., Viking Funding Group, Inc., George M. Greco, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Johnson v. Gagnon et al
as 9:2014cv00916
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Johnson
Defendant:
Brian Gagnon , Daniel Dumas , Brian Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03551
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Eider v. McCarthy et al
as 6:2014cv06216
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Eider
Defendant:
J. McCarthy, T. McIntyre, Ken. Kling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nasty Gal Inc. v. Jarvis et al
as 1:2014cv01135
Plaintiff:
Nasty Gal Inc.
Defendant:
Jason Jarvis and Mr. Nasty Time Entertainment Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
The Bank of New York Mellon v. Hatter et al
as 2:2014cv01024
Defendant:
Beneficial New York Inc.,, Clerk of the Suffolk County District Court, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
