Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Pierre Mitelmann v. Schumacher Cargo Logistics Inc et al
as 2:2011cv05375
Defendant:
Boomer LLC, Does, Schumacher Cargo Logistics Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Pierre Mitelmann
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NACA Logistics USA, Inc. v. Schumacher Cargo Logistics, Inc.
as 2:2010cv08903
Plaintiff:
NACA Logistics USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Schumacher Cargo Logistics, Inc.
Schumacher v. Hughesnet, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv03543
Plaintiff:
Eric Schumacher
Defendant:
Hughesnet, Inc., Hughes Communications, Inc., Hughes Network Systems, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Schumacher v. Hughesnet, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv01370
Plaintiff:
Eric Schumacher
Defendant:
Hughesnet, Inc., Hughes Communications, Inc., Hughes Network Systems, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Tommy Desoto et al v. Christopher Condon et al
as 8:2008cv00514
Defendant:
John Adsit, CT Holdings International Inc, Chistopher Condon and others
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Cardenas, Tommy Desoto, Kathy Ferrin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rod J Tawasha et al v. Centex Corporation et al
as 8:2008cv00793
Defendant:
CTX Mortgage Company LLC, Centex Corporation, Centex Homes and others
Plaintiff:
Camille Ricupito, Jeffrey Ricupito, Maysam F Tawasha and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Cintas Corporation v. Agler et al
as 3:2006cv05128
Petitioner:
Cintas Corporation
Respondent:
Bradley Agler, Sam Barbarotta, Daniel Lee Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Roundtree v. Adams, et al
as 1:2001cv06502
Plaintiff:
Benny Roundtree, Jr
Defendant:
Derral G. Adams , Edgar Castillo , T Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
