Cases 41 - 50 of 1,935
Braunskill v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Ralphiell Braunskill
Defendant:
Agent Danielle Smith, Clermont Co. Sheriff Dept., Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johanan v. Cuyahoga County Juvenile Court et al.
as 1:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Jessica Johanan
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Juvenile Court, Alison L. Floyd, Danielle Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Romanelli v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00936
Plaintiff:
Daniel Romanelli
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Daniels v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00946
Plaintiff:
Raenetta Daniels
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Raymond v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
Daniel Raymond, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Tirado v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00831
Plaintiff:
Daniel Tirado
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bronson v. Martin
as 1:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bronson
Defendant:
Mark Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Dunn v. Pietraszkiewicz et al.
as 1:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Michael Dunn
Defendant:
Officer Ann Pietraszkiewicz, Detective Gregory Williams, Officer John Marincek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Daniels v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Emma Daniels
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garland v. Mason et al.
as 4:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Jason Milford Garland
Defendant:
Major Daniel Mason, Chaplin Tom and Sergeant Maynard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
