Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Humphries v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2017cv00362
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Kerry L. Humphries
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rimer et al v. Coumou et al
as 3:2017cv00281
Defendant:
Clark County Commissioners, Clark, County of, Lucinda Coumou and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Lancaster, Brian Kerry O'Keefe, Stanley Rimer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00375
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02931
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00593
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wood v. J Choo USA, Inc.
as 2:2016cv02315
Defendant:
J Choo USA, Inc.
Interested Party:
Shift4 Corporation
Plaintiff:
Kerri C Wood
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
O'Keefe v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2016cv00471
Respondent:
Robert LeGrand and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Brian Kerry O'Keefe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
O'Keefe v. LeGrand
as 3:2016cv00430
Respondent:
Robert LeGrand
Petitioner:
Brian Kerry O'Keefe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02345
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
