Cases 41 - 50 of 101
Atkinson et al v. The Medical Protective Company et al
as 1:2017cv00844
Plaintiff:
Thomas Atkinson , James Albers , Paul Baker and others
Defendant:
The Medical Protective Company, Lindhorst & Dreidame Co. LPA, Unknown Agents And Employee of Defendants and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Keefe v. LeGrand
as 2:2017cv00845
Petitioner:
Brian Kerry O'Keefe
Respondent:
Robert LeGrand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ruhul Hark v. Sessions et al
as 4:2017cv01372
Petitioner:
Mohammed Awal Ruhul Hark
Respondent:
Jeff Sessions, John Kerry, Rebecca Aducci and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Augst et al v. Medtronic, Inc et al
as 1:2017cv00187
Plaintiff:
Thomas Augst , Jody Bauer , Amanda Ayres and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Heitzenrater v. Ginnetti
as 4:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
Kerry R Heitzenrater
Defendant:
Patrick Ginnetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bond et al v. Antero Resources Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00014
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey T Bond , Kerri Bond and Schmidt Family Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Antero Resources Corporation and Antero Resources Midstream Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wang v. Obama et al
as 2:2016cv01182
Plaintiff:
Hong Wang
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Loretta Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Verrocchio v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2016dp20186
Plaintiff:
Kerry A. Verrocchio
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
