Cases 41 - 50 of 1,260
MILLER v. BOSTIC NURSING CENTER
as 5:2023cv00409
Plaintiff:
TRACY ANTHONY MILLER
Defendant:
BOSTIC NURSING CENTER, COLLETTE LEWIS, JENNA BRANTLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv04784
Plaintiff:
Jason H. Miller
Defendant:
The State of Georgia and Fani T. Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Miller v. McFarland
as 4:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Reginald Miller
Defendant:
Andrew McFarland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Omelchenko v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2023cv04041
Plaintiff:
Lev Omelchenko
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Lieutenant Desmond Floyd and Officer Carl Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (National Origin)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
