Cases 41 - 50 of 81
Pierce v. Rasco, et al.
as 2:2012cv00206
Plaintiff:
Jairie T. Pierce, Jr.
Defendant:
Bill Rasco, Keith Kite, Billy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Regions Bank v. Pierce et al
as 2:2012cv00208
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank
Defendant:
Dennis L. Pierce, Dennis Pierce, Inc., Gwen Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Pierce v. 1st Case, Facts of Indigent Appeals et al
as 4:2012cv00176
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Pierce
Defendant:
1st Case, Facts of Indigent Appeals, 2nd Case of ARP and Use of Camera at EMCF run by MTC Management Training Corporation, East Mississippi Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Sparkman et al
as 1:2012cv00226
Plaintiff:
Jairie T. Pierce, Jr.
Defendant:
Emmitt Sparkman, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. USA
as 3:2012cv00384
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Warren Clifton Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Galloway v. Epps et al
as 2:2012cv00022
Plaintiff:
Charles Galloway
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Officials of Stone County Miss. Corr. Facility, Unknown Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. United Home Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2011cv00790
Plaintiff:
Roland Pierce
Defendant:
United Home Life Insurance Company and Shawn L. Harness
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pierce v. Lance et al
as 2:2011cv00086
Plaintiff:
Jairie T. Pierce, Jr.
Defendant:
Brad Lance, Joe Gallop, Steve Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
