Cases 41 - 50 of 856
Watson v. Lamar County
as 4:2022cv00925
Plaintiff:
Tyler Gage Watson
Respondent:
Lamar County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Lamar County
as 4:2022cv03685
Plaintiff:
Tyler Gage Watson
Defendant:
Lamar County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03516
Petitioner:
Tyler Gage Watson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruddy v. KR Watson Corp
as 4:2022cv03138
Plaintiff:
Cristal Ruddy
Defendant:
KR Watson Corp d/b/a AtWork Personnel Services and KR Watson Corp doing business as Atwork Personnel Services
Watson v. Hawkins
as 4:2022cv02892
Petitioner:
Teresa Ann Watson
Respondent:
Tonya Benton Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Minix v. Morrell et al
as 6:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Paul Minix
Defendant:
Nicholas Morrell, Tom Watson, Trey Hattaway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ostic et al v. United Regional Health Care System et al
as 3:2022cv01804
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ostic and Janet Ostic
Defendant:
United Regional Health Care System Inc, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Scheila Farnsworth Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Watson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00321
Petitioner:
Christopher M. Watson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Womack et al v. Murray
as 5:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Shanita Denise Womack and Nikita Goffney, SR
Defendant:
Owen J Murray, David J Baker, Linda K Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
