Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 41 - 50 of 93
BUSHANSKY v. NELSON et al
as 2:2012cv01101
Plaintiff: STEPHEN BUSHANSKY
Defendant: TODD S. NELSON , JOHN R. MCKERNAN, JR. , PAUL J. SALEM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MULLINS v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv03237
Plaintiff: CHRISTINA MULLINS
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MULLINS-LEE v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv03066
Plaintiff: WANDA JANE MULLINS-LEE
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MULLINS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv01713
Plaintiff: JOAN MULLINS and JANELLE PIERSALL
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ALBONDOZ, FOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MULLINS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv05747
Plaintiff: SOLOMON A. MULLINS
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MULLINS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv05661
Plaintiff: WILLIAM MULLINS
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MULLIN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv42411
Plaintiff: HARRY MULLIN, JR.
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MULLINS v. A-C PRODUCTS LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv43189
Plaintiff: VIRGIL K. MULLINS
Defendant: A-C PRODUCTS LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MULLINS et al v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv39275
Plaintiff: CHARLES D. MULLINS , WILLARD E. BARTEL , DAVID C. PEEBLES and others
Defendant: ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MULLINS et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv39276
Plaintiff: CHARLES D. MULLINS , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?