Cases 41 - 50 of 2,777
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tapia v. Dean Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv00388
Petitioner:
Jose Tapia
Respondent:
Robert S. Dean Jr. and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company a/s/o Bradley T. Woodcock and State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and RODANTE S. PAZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Holup v. Nines et al
as 1:2024cv00123
Petitioner:
Bradford S. Holup
Respondent:
Jeff Nines and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gregory v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 8:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Zakareeya Gregory
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
S.M. v. Ellis
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
S M, A M and S. M.
Defendant:
Kesean Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Robinson et al v. Cannon et al
as 8:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jerome Robinson and Sheila S. Boston
Defendant:
Clifton M. Cannon and Renee L. Cannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
