Cases 41 - 50 of 61
SALAZAR v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv52741
Plaintiff:
MICKEY SALAZAR
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
KELLEY et al v. SALAZAR et al
as 2:2011cv05537
Plaintiff:
CONNIE KELLEY and DONALD KELLEY
Defendant:
KEN SALAZAR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES NATIONAL PARK SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
SALAZAR v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv44477
Plaintiff:
RUBEN SALAZAR
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
JALLOH v. LOPEZ et al
as 2:2011cv04122
Plaintiff:
ABDUL JALLOH
Defendant:
ROBERT LOPEZ, TIMOTHY GOODSON and MARIA SALAZAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks et al v. FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound et al
as 1:2011cv01095
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Damian Black Fox
Defendant:
FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound, Dougless Williams, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks v. Sager et al
as 1:2011cv00741
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
S. Sager, R & D Department, Fort Dix, NJ CFCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2011cv00669
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
A. Whitaker, Stevens, J. Tenor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SALAZAR et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON CO. et al
as 2:2010cv81194
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. SALAZAR and MARY SALAZAR
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON CO. , AMERICAN ASBESTOS CO., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SALAZAR et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2010cv82866
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. SALAZAR
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SALAZAR v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
as 2:2010cv52254
Plaintiff:
GUADALUPE SALAZAR
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
