Cases 41 - 50 of 2,702
JACKSON v. FREEDOM MORTGAGE PAVILION et al
as 1:2024cv01049
Plaintiff:
JEWEL JACKSON
Defendant:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE PAVILION, SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO BB&T PAVILION, ABC CORP. 1-10 (FICTITIOUS ENTITIES) and FREEDOM MORTGAGE PAVILION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
MCCALL v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2024cv01045
Plaintiff:
ANTOYANE MCCALL
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, DETECTIVE CHRISTOPHER DOBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CORDERO ESPINOZA v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
PRESLEY STEVEN CORDERO ESPINOZA
Defendant:
JAMAD T. WILLIAMS and UNITED STATE POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
HINES v. NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE et al
as 3:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
KENNETH T. HINES
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE and VICTORIA L. KUHN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TURNER v. VESTBERG et al
as 2:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
JANIS TURNER
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TURNER v. VESTBERG et al
as 3:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
JANIS TURNER
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Not Yet Classified:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
YOONS T&C v. KIM et al
as 3:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
YOONS T&C
Defendant:
YOUNG KIM and CAREOX LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FRANCO v. AT&T INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
TYLER FRANCO
Defendant:
AT&T INC., RICKY SINGH, KALSI SINGH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
