Cases 41 - 50 of 84
Coles, Jr. v. Richmond City Jail
as 1:2014cv00595
Plaintiff:
Fred Watkins Coles, Jr.
Defendant:
Richmond City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Board of Trustees, National Stabilization Agreement of the Sheet Metal Industry Trust Fund et al v. S.M. Watkins Sheet Metal, LLC
as 1:2014cv00497
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees, National Stabilization Agreement of the Sheet Metal Industry Trust Fund , Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund , Board of Trustees, International Training Institute for the Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Industry and others
Defendant:
S.M. Watkins Sheet Metal, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Watkins v. USA
as 4:2012cv00168
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael O. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gravely v. USA
as 4:2012cv80496
Petitioner:
Watkins C. Gravely, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Watkins v. USA
as 3:2012cv00456
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Terrence Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Watkins v. Clarke
as 7:2012cv00255
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Petitioner:
Junius L. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watkins v. Unnamed
as 7:2012cv00219
Respondent:
Unnamed
Petitioner:
Junius L. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Watkins v. Wilson
as 1:2012cv00323
Petitioner:
Michael Watkins
Respondent:
Edward D. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas, III v. VCU Health System et al
as 1:2011cv01229
Plaintiff:
Earl Thomas, III
Defendant:
VCU Health System, MCV Hospitals & Physicians, Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
