Cases 41 - 50 of 119
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02085
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., et al
as 3:2020cv00044
Plaintiff:
Donald E Miller and Linda S Miller
Defendant:
Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., SPX Cooling Technologies, Inc., Individually and as Successor In Interest to Marley Cooling Tower Company, Simpsons Timber Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brook v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2019cv01804
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Sean C. Brook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Sheldon v. Cleaver-Brooks, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01443
Defendant:
Cleaver-Brooks, Inc. and KOGAP Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Pamela Gale Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alvarez v. University of Oregon et al
as 6:2019cv01071
Defendant:
Geri Brooks, University of Oregon, Luke Sitts and others
Plaintiff:
James-Brent: Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01170
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simms v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2019cv00978
Plaintiff:
Russell Simms and Russell Brook Simms
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g
Cleaver-Brooks, Inc. v. California Environmental Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00310
Defendant:
Anthem Builders Inc., California Environmental Systems, Inc. and Berkley Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Cleaver-Brooks, United States of America and Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3133
Brooks v. Cain et al
as 2:2018cv02033
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Greg James Brooks
Defendant:
J. Beaumont, Monica Landaverde, Michael Gower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
