Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Ervin et al v. DePuy Orthopaedic, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp21767
Plaintiff:
Michelle Ervin and Louis Ervin
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedic, Inc. , DePuy Inc., , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ervin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2011cv00790
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Ervin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Marcum v. Scioto County, Ohio et al
as 1:2010cv00790
Plaintiff:
Candy Marcum
Defendant:
Scioto County, Ohio, Scioto County, Ohio Board of County Commissioners, Marty V. Donini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ervin v. Smith
as 1:2009cv02586
Petitioner:
Wayne Ervin
Respondent:
Keith Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. S.A. Cultrona, Inc. d/b/a Loose Moose Cafe et al
as 1:2009cv02464
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp., Sony/ATV Songs LLC and others
Defendant:
S.A. Cultrona, Inc. d/b/a Loose Moose Cafe and Samuel A. Cultrona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Kenion
as 3:2009mc00014
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Ervin Kenion
Ervin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2009cv00591
Plaintiff:
Mike Ervin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ervin v. USA
as 1:2009cv01237
Respondent:
United States of America and United States of America
Petitioner:
Gary Ervin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ervin v. Warden, U S P Lewisburg
as 1:2009cv00028
Petitioner:
Gary D. Ervin
Respondent:
Warden, U S P Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harper v. Lincoln Electric Company et al
as 1:2008wf17719
Defendant:
Lincoln Electric Company, Hobart Brothers Company, Illinois Tool Works, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ervin Harper and Ervin Harper
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
