Cases 41 - 50 of 294
Jones v. Poshmark, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01562
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Poshmark, Inc., Chandra Manish, Navin Chaddha and others
Jones v. ABIOMED, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01507
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
ABIOMED, Inc., Michael R. Minogue, Paula A. Johnson and others
Johnson v. PBF Logistics LP et al
as 1:2022cv01454
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
PBF Logistics LP, Thomas J. Nimbley, Michael D. Gayda and others
Flonnory v. Aquila Of Delaware et al
as 1:2022cv01369
Plaintiff:
Jakeen Flonnory
Defendant:
Aquila Of Delaware and Kristin Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sage Chemical, Inc. et al v. Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01302
Plaintiff:
Sage Chemical, Inc. and TruPharma, LLC
Defendant:
Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Britannia Pharmaceuticals Limited, US WildMeds Partners, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Custis v. Graves et al
as 1:2022cv01220
Plaintiff:
Charmaine Custis
Defendant:
Alisa Graves, M & T Bank, Aaron Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hanger, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01183
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Hanger, Inc., Christopher B. Begley, Vinit K. Asar and others
Gray v. DeMatteis et al
as 1:2022cv01162
Plaintiff:
Sean M. Gray, Sr.
Defendant:
Claire DeMatteis, Dr. Erskins, Michael Records and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. SharkNinja Operating LLC
as 1:2022cv01140
Plaintiff:
Tamikka Jones
Defendant:
SharkNinja Operating LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. City of Wilmington et al
as 1:2022cv01064
Plaintiff:
Terence Jones
Defendant:
City of Wilmington, City of Wilmington Police Department, Office Guy Debonaventura and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
