Cases 41 - 50 of 338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ball v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2022cv00386
Plaintiff:
Travis Aaron Ball
Defendant:
B. Mitchell, J. Smith, B. Meade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00293
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mitchell v. Roanoke City Sheriff Department et al
as 7:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Kasim Jeremiah Mitchell
Defendant:
Roanoke City Sheriff Department and Medical Naff Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Coward
as 4:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
John A. Mitchell, III
Defendant:
Stacy D. Coward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Corbin v. Movassaghi et al
as 6:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Corbin
Defendant:
Sonya Movassaghi, DMD, Karen Woodson, RNC, Goutom Bhowmick, DDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell et al v. Golden Years Assisted Living Facility, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
LaTasha Mitchell and Pamela Boone
Defendant:
Golden Years Assisted Living Facility, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Fields v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Andrew Fields, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden Streeval, A.W. Goldey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bentz et al v. Taishan Gypsum Co., Ltd. et al
as 2:2022cv00016
Defendant:
Taishan Gypsum Co. Ltd., Shandong Taihe Dongxin Co. Ltd., Tai'an Taishan Plasterboard Co., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly Bentz, Scott Spires, James Blankenship and others
Lam v. Clarke
as 7:2022cv00007
Petitioner:
Mitchell Lee Lam
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
