Cases 41 - 50 of 71
ACEVEDO et al v. SIMPLY L. TRUCKING, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv06080
Plaintiff:
LENIN I. ACEVEDO and MANGELIN ACEVEDO
Defendant:
SIMPLY L. TRUCKING, LLC , JOSEPHAT MOENGA , JOHN DOE #1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ACEVEDO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2014cv07250
Plaintiff:
NOEMI ACEVEDO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WITHERSPOON v. ACEVEDO et al
as 2:2014cv06705
Plaintiff:
DESMOND WITHERSPOON
Defendant:
STEPHANIE ACEVEDO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02052
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
DESPOSITO v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2014cv01641
Plaintiff:
SONNY DESPOSITO
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BERGEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, JOHN L. MOLINELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ACEVEDO et al v. JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2014cv00018
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ACEVEDO , DAWON BALDWIN and TORELL MILLER
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF JERSEY CITY, JULIO GALINDO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GROHS et al v. SANTIAGO et al
as 2:2013cv03877
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GROHS, RAYFORD L. SMITH, KARL SIEGEL and others
Defendant:
SANTIAGO, BLEEKLY, B. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ACEVEDO v. ATLEE YOUNGBLOOD et al
as 2:2012cv04770
Plaintiff:
FRANCES ACEVEDO
Defendant:
ATLEE YOUNGBLOOD , PAUL MILLER TRUCKING, INC , JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ACEVEDO v. COMPREHENSIVE BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv06991
Plaintiff:
MIRIAM ACEVEDO
Defendant:
COMPREHENSIVE BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE, INC. and DAWN CERRUTEO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
