Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 41 - 50 of 80
JOHNSON v. JOHNSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv08896
Petitioner: AHMAD JOHNSON
Respondent: STEPHEN JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
R C GLOBAL, INC. v. FIRST AMERICAN AIR SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv07410
Plaintiff: R C GLOBAL, INC.
Defendant: FIRST AMERICAN AIR SERVICE, INC., MOHAMMAD ASHRAF, NEELOFER AHMAD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SINGH et al v. TOWNSHIP OF WEEHAWKEN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv03478
Plaintiff: SANTOSH SINGH , VIRENDRA SINGH and 63-65 CHESTNUT, LLC
Defendant: TOWNSHIP OF WEEHAWKEN , RICHARD F. TURNER , GIOVANNI D. AHMAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03426
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01586
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ZT GROUP INT'L, INC. v. AHMAD
as 2:2014cv06074
Plaintiff: ZT GROUP INT'L, INC.
Defendant: MUNIR AHMAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02964
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
AHMAD v. DANIYAL ENTERPRISES LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv01142
Plaintiff: AFZAAL AHMAD
Defendant: DANIYAL ENTERPRISES LLC and WASEEM CHAUDHARY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
AZIZ v. CARTAGENA et al
as 2:2013cv01158
Plaintiff: AHMED ABD EL AZIZ
Defendant: R. CARTAGENA, POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOES 1-10, THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. DESOKY
as 8:2013mc00091

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?