Cases 41 - 50 of 1,216
CLARKE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv03988
Petitioner:
ANDREW F. CLARKE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
JAMES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01002
Plaintiff:
ANDREW S JAMES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
LOGAN v. GARLAND et al
as 3:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
MARY BASILE LOGAN
Defendant:
MERRITT GARLAND, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, WILLIAM J. BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PANTOJA v. LIFECELL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv01060
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PANTOJA
Defendant:
LIFECELL CORPORATION and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv23419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
SON V. LYNCH, ET AL.
as 2:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Yong Chul Son
Defendant:
Thomas G. Lynch, Andrew S. Strauss, Michael Skinder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
COPELAND et al v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2023cv23409
Plaintiff:
MARCIA COPELAND, M.D. and MILDRED JACKSON
Defendant:
JUDGE ANNE THOMPSON, JUDGE FREDA WOLFSON, JUDGE NOEL HILLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv22643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
