Cases 41 - 50 of 458
Boyd v. Gille et al
as 1:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
Raymond Boyd
Defendant:
P. Gille, K. Arnold, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UFCW Local 50 Pension Fund et al v. Arnold's Meat Food Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04125
Defendant:
Arnold's Meat Food Products, Inc., Arnold and John Doe Companies 1-99
Plaintiff:
UFCW Local 50 Pension Fund and Its Trustee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 d Federally Assisted Programs
Arnold v. Iris Properties, Inc.
as 1:2022cv04223
Defendant:
Iris Properties (NY), Inc. and Iris Properties, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Bruce Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Palmer v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv00481
Plaintiff:
Timothy Palmer
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci and J. Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quance v. Volt Information Sciences, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02954
Plaintiff:
James Quance
Defendant:
Volt Information Sciences, Inc., William J. Grubbs, Nick S. Cyprus and others
Fay v. Volt Information Sciences, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02926
Plaintiff:
Robert Fay
Defendant:
William J. Grubbs, Nick S. Cyprus, Bruce G. Goodman and others
Redfield v. Volt Information Sciences, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01816
Plaintiff:
Denise Redfield
Defendant:
Volt Information Sciences, Inc., William J. Grubbs, Nick S. Cyprus and others
Newman v. Falcon Minerals Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01203
Plaintiff:
Arnold Newman
Defendant:
Falcon Minerals Corporation, Claire R. Harvey, William D. Anderson and others
Matos v. Quality Modular Services, LLC et. al.
as 2:2022cv01144
Plaintiff:
Romero Azevedo Matos
Defendant:
Quality Modular Services, LLC, Arnold Sobral and Helder J. Pedrosa, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
