Cases 41 - 50 of 899
Malone v. City of Akron, Ohio et al.
as 5:2023cv02273
Plaintiff:
Ladamien Lavelle Malone
Defendant:
City of Akron, Ohio, City of Akron Police Department, John Edwards, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chappel v. Hunter et al
as 1:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
Dawn M Chappel
Defendant:
Magistrate David M Hunter, Tyler Cantrell, Mackenzie Carrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Verlander v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03740
Plaintiff:
Adam Verlander
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nitzel v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03507
Plaintiff:
Adam Nitzel
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Motley v. Dream Living LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03478
Plaintiff:
Phileisha Yuvette Motley
Defendant:
Dream Living LLC doing business as 10x Property, Gamal Harding, Amalea Harding and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Bryant v. City of Berea et al.
as 1:2023cv02032
Plaintiff:
James K Bryant and James Bryant
Defendant:
City of Berea, City of Berea Police Department, Daniel J Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03339
Plaintiff:
Adam Stephens
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03262
Plaintiff:
Sean Adams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
