Cases 41 - 50 of 902
Nichols v. Warnecke
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Randy Dean Nichols
Defendant:
John Michael Warnecke, Mathew Ellis, Adam Rummer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Adams v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04085
Plaintiff:
Omar Jarrison Adams
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Bard Davol, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chappel v. Hunter et al
as 1:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
Dawn M Chappel
Defendant:
Magistrate David M Hunter, Tyler Cantrell, Mackenzie Carrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Price v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04224
Plaintiff:
Adam G. Price
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04132
Plaintiff:
Charlie M. Adams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Malone v. City of Akron, Ohio et al.
as 5:2023cv02273
Plaintiff:
Ladamien Lavelle Malone
Defendant:
City of Akron, Ohio, City of Akron Police Department, John Edwards, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Verlander v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03740
Plaintiff:
Adam Verlander
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stephens v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03339
Plaintiff:
Adam Stephens
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gonzales et al. v. The Ohio State University
as 2:2023cv03051
Plaintiff:
Edward Gonzales, Kent Kilgore, Adam Plouse and others
Defendant:
The Ohio State Univesity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Nitzel v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03507
Plaintiff:
Adam Nitzel
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
