Cases 41 - 50 of 116
Indemnity Insurance Company of North America v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02575
Plaintiff:
Indemnity Insurance Company of North America
Defendant:
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. and China Airlines, Ltd.
Cross_claimant:
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
China Airlines, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ceva Freight, LLC et al v. China Cargo Airlines Ltd et al
as 1:2017cv01407
Plaintiff:
Ceva Freight, LLC and Ceva Logistics U.S., Inc.
Defendant:
China Cargo Airlines Ltd and China Eastern Airlines Corporation Ltd
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
China Cargo Airlines, Ltd. v. Unical Aviation, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00749
Plaintiff:
China Cargo Airlines, Ltd.
Defendant:
Unical Aviation, Inc.
Sarix S.A. v. YRC Worldwide Inc. (Delaware et al
as 1:2015cv07328
Defendant:
C.A.L. Cargo Airlines Ltd., Fracht FWO, Inc., Fracht Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Sarix S.A.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Matute v. El Al Israel Airlines Ltd.
as 1:2015cv06108
Defendant:
El Al Israel Airlines Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Or Matute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
WestJet et al v. Lipsman
as 1:2015mc00174
Petitioner:
WestJet and WestJet Airlines Ltd.
Respondent:
Graham Lipsman
Kwak v. Silkair et al
as 3:2015cv01765
Plaintiff:
Jeong Eun Kwak
Defendant:
Silkair and Singapore Airlines, LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Nicoll et al v. El Al Israel Airlines Ltd.
as 9:2015cv81252
Plaintiff:
Fay Nicoll and Richard Nicoll
Defendant:
El Al Israel Airlines Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vimalaben Patel v. Singapore Airlines Ltd et al.
as 2:2015cv04205
Defendant:
Does and Singapore Airlines Ltd
Plaintiff:
Vimalaben Patel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
