Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Alford v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution
as 3:2012cv00415
Petitioner:
Antonio Alford
Respondent:
Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alford v. Goodrich
as 1:2012cv02931
Petitioner:
Darryl Alford
Respondent:
Barry Goodrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alford et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp21664
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Alford and Kevin Alford
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy International, Ltd. , DePuy, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hinton v. Teodosio et al
as 5:2012cv01267
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Hinton
Defendant:
Linda Tucci Teodosio, James Whited, Scott Rubes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alford v. Pittman
as 5:2011cv02793
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Darnell Alford
Defendant:
Ken Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alford v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
as 1:2011cv00862
Petitioner:
Brian Keith Alford
Respondent:
Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cotton et al v. Cincinnati City of et al
as 1:2011cv00389
Plaintiff:
Alford B. Cotton , Rubbie D. Cotton and State of Ohio
Defendant:
Cincinnati City of , Amit B. Ghosh , Sean Minihan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Alford v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2011cv01011
Plaintiff:
Jerry Alford
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425
Cotton et al v. City of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2010cv00927
Plaintiff:
Alford B Cotton and Rubbie D Cotton
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Amit B. Ghosh, Sean Minihan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alford v. Shartle
as 4:2010cv02815
Petitioner:
Brian Keith Alford
Respondent:
J.T. Shartle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
