Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Yang v. Aytes et al
as 8:2009cv00228
Plaintiff:
Li Yang
Defendant:
Michael Aytes and David Roark
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Tang et al v. Synutra International, Inc. et al
as 8:2009cv00088
Defendant:
Synutra, Inc., Synutra International, Inc. and American St. George Biological Technology Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jiali Tang, Yongde Liu, Ping Mu and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Physicians Reliance Association, Inc. v. Mei Li
as 1:2008mc00279
Plaintiff:
Physicians Reliance Association, Inc.
Defendant:
Theodore Chi- Mei Li
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type:
Other Statutes
Song et al v. Chertoff et al
as 8:2008cv02458
Plaintiff:
Changcheng Song and Bailing Li
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Jonathan Scharfen, Evelyn Upchurch and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Li v. Chertoff et al
as 8:2008cv01308
Plaintiff:
Zhen Li
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Michael B. Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Li et al v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv00920
Plaintiff:
Jianzhong Li, Zhanling Wang and Weishan Li
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Evelyn Upchurch and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Li et al v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv02607
Plaintiff:
Xiaoling Li, Liping Feng and Yilin Feng
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzales, Evelyn Upchurch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Li v. Chertoff et al
as 8:2007cv00757
Plaintiff:
Xiao Yan Li
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Richard Caterisano and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Wu et al v. Chertoff et al
as 8:2007cv00318
Plaintiff:
Chuanjin Wu and Tao Li
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzales, Paul Novak and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
