Cases 41 - 50 of 418
Gonzalez v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Angel Gonzalez
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Warden and Deputy Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Quiros
as 3:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Tyrick Thomas
Defendant:
Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Early v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Wayne Early
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Christopher Brunelle, Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Dept. of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Victor Lamond Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Dept of Correction, Wilson, Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Victor Lamond Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Angel Quiros, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hasan v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Amin Hasan
Defendant:
Angel Quiros and Ned McCormick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jordan v. Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Victor L Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Department of Correction, Angel Quiros, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephenson v. Davis
as 24-414
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH STEPHENSON, (Class of One, Pro-se Petitioner)
Defendant:
CARLENE DAVIS, (D.O.C. Counselor Supervisor), ANGEL QUIROS, (Commissioner-Conn. Dept of Correction, BARONE, (Warden, MacDougall State Prison) and others
Rosegreen v. Lloyd et al
as 3:2023cv01632
Plaintiff:
Lamont Rosegreen
Defendant:
Lloyd, Curney, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01681
Plaintiff:
Tyrick Thomas
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Angel Quiros, Nick Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
