Cases 41 - 50 of 905
Anderlohr v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv01807
Plaintiff:
Kristi Ann Anderlohr
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sonney v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01804
Plaintiff:
Leslie Ann Sonney
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Clint Hickman and Dawn Noggle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor et al v. Sweeney et al
as 2:2023cv01792
Plaintiff:
Shauneshia Ann Taylor and Ann's Eclectic Services LLC
Defendant:
Antonio Andrew Sweeney and I Learn Research and Consulting Firm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Red v. Arizona State Prison Complex Perryville et al
as 2:2023cv01787
Plaintiff:
Felicia Ann Red
Defendant:
Arizona State Prison Complex Perryville and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nalley v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2023cv01737
Plaintiff:
Deborah Ann Nalley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johnson v. Vandenburg
as 2:2023cv01660
Plaintiff:
Dexter Richard Johnson
Defendant:
Lisa Ann Vandenburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv01550
Plaintiff:
Emily Ann Miller
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. J.E.T. Limousines & Transportation LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01476
Plaintiff:
Robert H McDonald, Jr
Defendant:
J.E.T. Limousines & Transportation LLC, William Jinks, Unknown Jinks and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Munoz v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv01218
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Munoz
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rygg v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv01160
Plaintiff:
Jessica Ann Rygg
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
