Cases 41 - 50 of 128
Arellano v. Sam's Club aka Sam's East, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00146
Plaintiff:
Leticia Arellano
Defendant:
Sam's Club aka Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gomez Arellano v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv00141
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
Blanca Gomez Arellano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Freeman v. Valdez et al
as 3:2019cv00332
Defendant:
Shamika Friar, T Banks, Stella Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Craig Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Catete v. Young & Sons Drywall, L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv00402
Plaintiff:
Celso Catete
Defendant:
Young & Sons Drywall, L.P. and Armando Arellano
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lumsden et al v. Davis et al
as 5:2019cv00025
Plaintiff:
Shawn Mayreis, Jason Hendershott, Raymond Lumsden and others
Defendant:
Ronald Givens, Asst Warden FNU Steigel, Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lumsden et al v. Davis et al
as 4:2019cv00049
Plaintiff:
Shawn Mayreis, Jason Hendershott, Raymond Lumsden and others
Defendant:
John Doe, Ronald Givens and Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez et al v. Garcia et al
as 2:2018cv00446
Defendant:
BUREAU OF CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, JUAN ENRIQUE ESCOBED MORENO, GREGORIO VALDEZ and others
Plaintiff:
Minor AAG, VERONICA RAMIREZ and Deceased Estate of Martin Gomez Arrellano
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Blanca Gomez Arellano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Arellano v. TDCJ-CID
as 4:2018cv04370
Petitioner:
Isaias Arellano
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID and Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Arellano-Rocha
as 3:2018cv00309
Petitioner:
Efren G. Arellano-Rocha
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Stafford v. Adler et al
as 1:2018cv00757
Defendant:
Ellen Troxclair, Allison Alter, Steve Adler and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Stafford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
