Cases 41 - 50 of 60
BAILEY v. MARTINEZ
as 3:2011cv00435
Petitioner:
Ari Bailey
Respondent:
R. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-15825
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Ari Bailey
as 10-2851
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ARI BAILEY
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JUAN R SANCHEZ
In re: Ari Bailey
as 10-2796
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ARI BAILEY
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JUAN R SANCHEZ
Ari Bailey, et al v. American Correctional Assn, et al
as 10-2506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARI BAILEY
Plaintiff:
DAMION NELSON, JASPER JOCKERY, BRANDON SMALLS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSN, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CONNELLY, DR., ASST. DIRECTOR CORR. PROG. DIV. and others
Ari Bailey, et al v. Harley G. Lappin, et al
as 10-2507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARI BAILEY
Plaintiff:
DAMION NELSON, JASPER JOCKERY, BRANDON SMALLS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSN, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CONNELLY, DR., ASST. DIRECTOR CORR. PROG. DIV. and others
BAILEY et al v. AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2010cv01833
Plaintiff:
ARI BAILEY, DAMION NELSON, JASPER JOCKERY and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION, HARELY G. LAPPIN, CONNELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY et al v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2010cv01834
Plaintiff:
ARI BAILEY, DAMION NELSON, JASPER DUCKERY and others
Defendant:
HARELY G. LAPPIN, AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION, CONNELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2010cv00463
Plaintiff:
ARI BAILEY
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., CRANSTON J. MITCHELL, DEBORAH A. SPAGNOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-10067
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
