Cases 41 - 50 of 855
Foutch v. SSA
as 6:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey B. Foutch
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
McNeil v. Jordan
as 3:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Cedric B. McNeil
Respondent:
Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. USA
as 2:2023cv00012
Petitioner:
Michael B. Clark
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wallace v. Stageline Express, Inc
as 3:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Anthony B Wallace
Defendant:
Stageline Express, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Koplin B & W LLC v. Middleton Reutlinger P.S.C.
as 3:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Koplin B & W LLC
Defendant:
Middleton Reutlinger P.S.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Perry v. Papa John's International, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00681
Plaintiff:
Robert Perry
Defendant:
Papa John's International, Inc. doing business as Papa John's and Ann B. Gugino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Jenkins v. Mount Vernon Associates I, Limited Partnership et al
as 3:2022cv00680
Plaintiff:
Matilda Jenkins
Defendant:
Mount Vernon Associates I, Limited Partnership, Mount Vernon Associates II, Limited Partnership, Gene B. Glick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Perez v. Hyman et al
as 6:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Adrian Perez
Defendant:
Alexander B. Hyman, Scott Jones, James Randall Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
