Cases filed in West Virginia
Cases 41 - 50 of 425
Jeffrey v. Ballard
as 2:2017cv03021
Petitioner: Mark Lynn Jeffrey
Respondent: David Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeffrey v. Ballard We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv03021
Petitioner: Mark Lynn Jeffrey
Respondent: David Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dement v. Ballard We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02711
Plaintiff: Keith Allen Dement
Defendant: David Ballard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Billiter v. Ballard We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00022
Petitioner: Harold M. Billiter
Respondent: David Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gray, Jr. v. Ballard et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00039
Petitioner: Rossi Anthony Gray, Jr.
Respondent: David Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harper v. Dillon et al
as 2:2013cv25077
Plaintiff: Cedeal Harper
Defendant: Kathy Dillon, David Ballard, Ralph Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas v. Gregory et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01007
Plaintiff: James A. Lucas
Defendant: Teresa Gregory, David Ballard and Jim Rubenstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galloway v. Ballard We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00993
Plaintiff: Don Garfield Galloway
Defendant: David Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Conner v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2015cv16208
Plaintiff: Michael Lee Conner, Jr.
Defendant: Jim Rubenstein , John Frame , David Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rydbom v. Boggs et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv12155
Defendant: Lisa Boggs , David Ballard and James Rubenstein
Plaintiff: Dennis Rydbom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?