Cases 41 - 49 of 49
ELKINS v. ASTRUE
as 4:2010cv00074
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
DARLA D. (BEASLEY) ELKINS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BATESVILLE SERVICES, INC. v. SAFE CHOICE, INC. et al
as 4:2010cv00023
Plaintiff:
BATESVILLE SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5, SAFE CHOICE, INC., SAFECHOICEINC.COM and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Beasley v. Bank of Elizabeth et al
as 2:2010cv00004
Plaintiff:
Quinton P Beasley
Defendant:
Bank of Elizabeth, Terry Kurt and Laurie Hilby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. Maynard et al
as 2:2009cv00419
Plaintiff:
Quinton Patrick Beasley
Defendant:
Brandy Maynard, Barbara Petty, Joy Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ELKINS v. ASTRUE
as 4:2008cv00077
Plaintiff:
DARLA D. (BEASLEY) ELKINS
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
TWIST et al v. LENSKI
as 4:2008cv00075
Plaintiff:
MARTIN RAY TWIST, MARTIN TWIST ENERGY COMPANY, LLC, CHEROKEE ENERGY COMPANY, LLC and others
Defendant:
THERESA LENSKI
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TWIST et al v. BENGFORT
as 4:2008cv00074
Plaintiff:
MARTIN RAY TWIST, MARTIN TWIST ENERGY COMPANY, LLC, CHEROKEE ENERGY COMPANY, LLC and others
Defendant:
JOHN BENGFORT
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
MCCLESKEY et al v. BEASLEY CONSTRUCTION, LLC
as 1:2007cv01239
Plaintiff:
MARK MCCLESKEY and INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS
Defendant:
BEASLEY CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
