Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Castro et al v. City of Miami et al
as 1:2013cv22661
Plaintiff:
Jorge Castro , Nestor Garcia , David Patino and others
Defendant:
City of Miami , City of Miami Firefighters' and Police Officers' Retirement Trust & Plan , The Board of Trustees of the City of Miami Firefighters' and Police Officers' Retirement Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Braddy v. The Wendy's Company
as 1:2013cv21929
Plaintiff:
Carleen A. Braddy
Defendant:
The Wendy's Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADDY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2012cv00499
Plaintiff:
D'ANDRAE BRADDY
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRADDY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2012cv00490
Plaintiff:
D'ANDRE BRADDY
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Braddy v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2012cv80450
Plaintiff:
Luther Braddy
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Braddy et al v. Ali Baba Cleaners, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv24495
Plaintiff:
Patsy D. Braddy and Steve Kowlessar
Defendant:
Ali Baba Cleaners, Inc. and Errol J. Mirmelli
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Coffey et al v. Braddy et al
as 3:2009mc00022
Plaintiff:
Olivette Coffey, Jr., Olivette Coffey, Jr., Olivette Coffey, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Dwight Braddy, Dwight Braddy, Dwight Braddy and others
Movant:
Sabrina Potter, Sabrina Potter, Kyor Sanders and others
Braddy v. Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 5:2009cv00322
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Braddy, Jr.
Defendant:
Bureau Of Prisons and FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Braddy v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2009cv00246
Petitioner:
Thomas M. Braddy, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
