Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Steve Martinez v. John Ziomek, et al
as 10-17330
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN ZIOMEK, DPM, Individual and Official Capacity, M. MARTEL, Warden, Individual and Official Capacity, CHRISTOPHER SMITH, M.D., Individual and Official Capacity and others
Abreu v. Cate et al
as 2:2010cv01621
Plaintiff:
Clifford Abreu
Defendant:
Matthew L. Cate, Richard Subia, Michael Martel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Scott v. K. Keller, et al
as 10-16226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
K. KELLER, K. POWELL, L. WEINHOLDT and others
Brett Marino v. Joe Seeley
as 10-6022
Debtor:
In re: Brett William Marino
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Brett William Marino
Defendant - Appellee:
Joe Seeley
Phillip Rosenblum v. Mule Creek State Prison, et al
as 10-15155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP J. ROSENBLUM
Defendant - Appellee:
MULE CREEK STATE PRISON, WASCO STATE PRISON MEDICAL, AKANNE, Doctor and others
Payne v. Mule Creek State, et al
as 2:2004cv01585
Plaintiff:
Mark Payne
Defendant:
Brett Williams , Troy Brimhall , Christopher Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macahilas v. Galloway, et al
as 2:2009cv03199
Plaintiff:
Michael Macahilas
Defendant:
Richard P. Galloway, William Douglas and Brett Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eichler v. Tilton et al
as 2:2009cv01032
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Eichler
Defendant:
J. Tilton, Woodford, Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cion Peralta v. R.P. Galloway, et al
as 09-15014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CION ADONIS PERALTA
Defendant - Appellee:
R.P. GALLOWAY, BRETT WILLIAMS and CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Dasher v. Williams et al
as 2:2008cv02206
Plaintiff:
Terrence Dasher
Defendant:
Brett Williams, Christopher Smith and R. P. Galloway
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
