Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Lewis v. Broderick et al
as 1:2014cv06947
Plaintiff:
Regina Lewis
Defendant:
Vernon Broderick, K. Ask-Carlson, Facey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Broderick et al
as 1:2014cv04681
Defendant:
K. Ask-Carlson, Vernon Broderick, Mr. Facey and others
Plaintiff:
Regina Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Williams et al
as 1:2014cv04706
Defendant:
Vernon Broderick, Martin Cohen, Lloyd Epstein and others
Plaintiff:
Regina Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv04191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Robinson v. Tryon et al
as 1:2013cv00672
Plaintiff:
Broderick Robinson
Defendant:
Todd Tryon, McClellan, Schieffeld and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Hannigan et al
as 1:2013cv00519
Plaintiff:
Elbert Welch
Defendant:
Charles Hannigan, James Punch, Michael Violante and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02504
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Broderick v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv01804
Petitioner:
Kyle Broderick
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Chisolm v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv02738
Defendant:
Police Officer Jason Broderick, Police Officer Alexandr Craivan, Police Officers John Does 1 through 4 and others
Plaintiff:
Marquise Chisolm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
